Thursday, October 20, 2011

新手買股票,先建立 10個正確態度


文章編號 : 1592  
發表時間 : 2011-10-20 11:20:35
你已經摩拳擦掌,迫不及待要投入股市大顯身手了嗎?別急,先建立起正確投資觀念,才能避免因為心理上的盲點,讓理財大計劃泡湯。

文─黃采薇
2006年6月 Cheers雜誌

1.選定產業,培養熟悉度、敏感度
股海茫茫,從哪裡下手?

投資股票的第1步就應該從券商報告、各類財經新聞中找出後勢看漲的族群,持續觀察,培養敏銳度。

如果投資的是電子業,三不五時到光華商場、fnac去逛逛,了解該產業鏈中哪些產品正當紅。

2.避免在行情處於高檔時忽略風險
當市場行情大好時,一般人常會因為過度樂觀連連加碼。卻忽略了股市上攀時,風險也相對增加。群益證券執行副總裁辛日祺舉例,同樣是7%的漲跌幅,股價從100元跌下來會損失7元,但從50元漲上去只賺了3塊5。

要用低點漲幅彌補高點跌幅,無異截短補長。一片長紅下更要如履薄冰,別讓過熱的氣氛亂了投資準頭。

3.買股票,挑產業中的龍頭股
新手上路,專家會建議先看產業龍頭股。舉例來說,手機族群首推宏達電,面板看友達,LED以億光、晶電為首,鋼鐵類股看中鋼,其他傳產各類股中,台塑是佼佼者。以這些競爭力較強的公司為指標,抓幾檔出來固定投資,較能穩定獲利。

4.不熟悉的股票別碰,切忌頻頻換股
投資股票市場最好只操作自己熟悉的股票,選定幾個時間點來回操作,甚至可以1年進出個1、2次就好,不要常常換股,才能累積對該投資標的的觀察。

5.沒準備20萬,勿輕易入股市
群益投信資產管理部基金經理蔡昀達認為,如果想要涉足股市,最好要有新台幣20萬元以上的資本額。

許多產業龍頭股市值高得嚇人,就算要採取融資的方式投資,還是要有一定資金才有「選股」空間,否則單買幾支雞蛋、水餃股,風險相對集中,也未必能挑到體質健全的股票。

6.財報數字停、看、聽
數字會說話,公司前景如何、能否持續獲利,財務報表一定能透露出端倪。

首先,注意該企業的營收、獲利和EPS(每股盈餘)是否持續成長,這些是企業營運成效反映在股價市值的指標性數字。可以畫張圖,看看這幾項指標在各時間點 上的變動。部份類股(例如電子股)營收會有明顯淡、旺季的差異,所以短時間的震盪不必太在意,抓個3、5年,只要趨勢向上,大抵上該公司體質堪稱穩健。

其次,觀察毛利率。毛利率高的公司在面對上、下游產品鏈通常有較高議價能力,獲利較為強勁。

除此之外,挑選類股時,成交量也是判準依據。元大證券研究中心協理鄭宗祺舉例,在台灣,科技類股的總市值約佔50%左右,但多數時候,交易量卻可以達到8成以上,代表電子股交易熱絡,是市場的當紅炸子雞。

他建議,投資人不妨觀望2~3個月,就可判斷出哪些類股是投資市場的主流。

7.不信明牌,理性為上
「老師在講,你有沒有在聽?」這又麻辣又諷刺的《全民大悶鍋》劇情,也常常在你的投資世界中上演嗎?當心,電視上投顧「老師」的「明牌好康報」,有時候反而是票房毒藥,讓你在投資市場上吃大虧。

其實,看財經新聞應該要著重在增加對投資知識的了解,諸如產業特性,或是國際貨幣、原物料價格走向與股票市場間的因果邏輯。至於到底該買哪支股,參酌各方資訊外,投資人該有自己的判斷。

8.「擦鞋童理論」保你免住套房
報上某支股票扶搖直上的消息,常讓人心癢難耐,急於加碼。元富證券投顧經理江政勳用「擦鞋童理論」的妙喻,提醒這個心理盲點:當市場行情已經熱絡到連擦鞋童都知道時,往往是「利多出盡」的時刻,此時宜減不宜加,千萬別讓你的錢跑在擦鞋童之後,成為市場上最後一隻老鼠。

9.設立明確停損點
買到一支連續3天跌停板的股票,該怎麼反應?

跌10%也許還沉得住氣、跌20%就開始心慌慌,如果聲勢再向下走,許多人往往眼不見為淨,鴕鳥式地悶頭不理,任憑股票就這樣以20%、50%的跌幅持續下墜,直到下市,投資血本無歸。

其實購買股票應該明確訂出停損點,配合波段操作,將損失降到最小。設定下跌10%時售出若干持有比重,下跌20%時再出售一部份股權。如此彈性操作,可以避免在利空大量失血,該股票回漲時,也不會因為早早拋售完畢而憾恨。

10.選擇現金股利高的股票
德盛安聯投信投資管理部副總經理吳宏圖認為,雖然台灣股市從去年到目前為止漲幅有限,但整個亞洲區過去2、3年漲幅不少,投資人還是保守為宜,投資人應該買些現金股利高、本益比相對較低,財務體質佳的股票,追求10%~15%的年報酬率,不要過度貪心。

Monday, October 17, 2011

分享锦集:股市的逆流-私有化

Oct 14th, 2011 | By 冷眼 | Category: 分享锦集

将上市公司私有化,是目前股市的热门课题。大股东采取突击行动,全面收购上市公司的股权,要将上市公司变成私人公司,居林的收购辛多拉、国民投资机构要併吞实达,就是典型的例子。

能在股票市场上市,是许多私人公司梦寐以求的事,既然已经上市了,为什么又要“倒行逆施”,将公司私有化?理由何在?

以下是我想到的一些原因,跟大家分享:

投资机会减少

现金充沛的公司,要在当前的环境中,寻找有利可图的投资机会,谈何容易。

大马的经济正处在尴尬的阶段,传统的行业,早已有人满之患,而新的行业,尤其是高科技及服务业,又没有足够的人才去开拓经营,贸贸然进行大量投资,风险特高,这些拥有现金的公司,没有魄力及胆识去作新投资,只好向现有成功企业下手,这是最安全的做法。

保守心态

将上市公司私有化,也反映了我国投资家,没有冒险及开创新领域的精神。

换句话说,这股私有化的逆流,反映了我国企业界的保守及故步自封的心态,这是现有政治经济环境下的产物,也是国家前进的绊脚石。

政府口口声声要私人界成为经济的火车头,然而私人界却没有开拓新领域的勇气。长此以往,在竞争激烈的国际经济环境中,大马迟早会被抛在后头。

不受约束

上市公司,受到许多繁文缛节的约束,作为大股东,他们动辄得咎。他们的一举一动,都受到当局的监管及社会舆论的督促,大股东不但没有自由,而且有时也相当受气。

作为大股东,他们有绑手绑脚的感觉。将公司私有化,可以使他们有发挥的最大空间。

现金流量的释放

作为上市公司,必须遵守许许多多的条例、规定,大股东的一举一动,都要照顾到小股东的利益和感受。

这就使大股东难以做事,一个明显的例子,就是公司现金的调动,受到严格的监管。

假设上市公司的大股东,拥有一家上市公司的控制性股权,同时拥有一家私人公司,当私人公司需要资金周转时,他不能将上市公司的现金调至私人公司使用,将上市公司私有化之后,他可以随意调动上市和私人公司的资金,使他能够抓住新的投资机会。

不需要筹资

公司上市的一个主要目的,是方便筹措资金,作为扩展业务用途。如果上市公司的业务没有扩展的空间,而公司资金又很充足的话,则公司根本就没有必要保持上市地位,私有化是合理的选择。

股票交投不活跃

有些上市公司的股票,长期交投不活跃,导致股东的资金被困,同时股价没有随着股市起落,价值长期被低估,私有化反而为小股东提供一个以合理价格将股票兑现的机会。

股票价值被低估

大马股市,到目前为止,还是由外资及投资基金领航,这些大户的投资对象,是盈利丰厚的大型上市公司,也就是交易量大的优质股。

这类公司不多,造成了优质股价格高不可攀,中小型上市公司股价长期不振的现象。

增股减低风险

现有中小型上市公司的股票,价值长期被低估。

这些公司的大股东,也是公司的掌舵人,他们了解公司股票的价值。

他们认为,与其去找别的投资机会,倒不如增加在现有公司的股权,这样更容易做到,风险也更低。

举个例子,上市产业公司要买地皮,不但难找,而且价格高得离谱,买到后也未必能赚钱。

现有上市公司已拥有宝贵的地皮,而且是在一、二十年前买进的,现在价值恐怕已上涨了10倍、8倍,然而在公司的帐目中,仍以当年买进时的价值入账,如果以现在的价格,将这些地皮重新估值的话,每股的净有形资产价值可能比现有股价高数倍。

既然如此,以市价收购股票,等于以低於市价数倍的价格购买地皮,上市产业的大股东认为与其到处买贵地,倒不如通过私有化,低价购买现成的土地,这样不但更合算,也更省事。

节省时间

要创办一家成功的公司,不但要有资金,还要有人才,更要有机会。有了这些条件,还要经过漫长时间的经营,才有可能上轨道,真是谈何容易。

现有上市公司,有许多是大股东花了许多心血打造成功的,他们了解创业的艰辛。

大股东自己投资

当他们的上市公司股票,价值长期被低估时,他们一方面感到心痛,认为市场不欣赏他们所作的努力,另一方面,他们也认为这是一个廉价增加投资的机会,他们的心态是:小股东既然不要投资于他们的公司,那么,他们大股东就自己来投资吧!

公司上市,原本是要让投资大众,有参与投资成功企业的机会,现在投资大众竟然不想投资。

那么,他们又何必强人之所难呢?倒不如干脆由他们大股东收回股票算了。

大股东别有居心

有些大股东,将上市公司私有化,其实是别有居心。

上市公司除牌5年之后,可以重新申请上市。

大股东将公司私有化之后,将自己私人公司的业务注入上市公司或是全力发展其业务,然后在5年后重估其价值,高价脱售部份股票给公众人士,重新上市,这样可以取得数倍的回酬。他能够这样做,是因为上市价格,是由大股东自订,证券监管当局不予以干涉。

故除牌5年后上市,乃大股东赚钱的锦囊妙计,何乐而不为?

分享锦集:商人不宜买股票

 Oct 7th, 2011 | By 冷眼 | Category: 冷眼分享集

股市是一个拍卖市场,通过投标的方式,买卖公司的股份,交易绝对公开、公平和自由,只要有钱,人人可买,完全没有身分的限制。

勿两头不到岸

但是,股市也好像别的市场一样,不是所有的人都适合参与,商人就是其中之一。

请注意,我只是说“不宜”买,并没说不能买,或不可买。

投资是商业行为,要赚钱,最好选择适合你的市场,所谓“适合”,是指跟你所从事的事业没有冲突。

否则,会导致你两头不到岸,得不偿失。

商人最好不要买股票,理由如下:

理由一:自己经营生意,是主动的行为。而股票投资是被动的行为。

假如你已经拥有自己的公司,无论大小,你都可以自己作主。

你可以根据你的构想,以自己的作风,用自己的经验和知识,去经营你的生意。你的公司要做什么,要怎样做,你说了算数。你可以发挥你的商才,实现你的抱负。

换句话说,你就是你的企业王国的国王,称为“老板”。

作为企业的司机,你要把你的“企业之车”驾向何方,你可以作主,不必理会别人的看法,也不受别人的节制。

你既然已拥有自己的“企业之车”,已是车主,为什么还要自贬身价,降低身分去做“搭客”?

你原本可以掌握自己的命运,为什么还要把命运交给别人去决定?

莫作牛后

升斗小民,因为没有拥有“企业之车”的命,只好把命运交给别人,任由他人摆布,那是无可奈何的事。你身为商人,已是“企业之车”的车主,为什么还要“龙邦”别人的车?

中国人有句话“宁为鸡前,莫作牛后”。“鸡前”就是鸡头;“牛后”就是牛屁股。鸡首吃美食;牛后拉屎尿。为什么你有鸡前不做,却要做牛后?

作为商人,如果你要淌股市这一浑水的话,正确的做法,是专心把生意做大,让你的公司上市,在上市公司拥有控制性股权,这样,你拥有上市公司的股票,利用股市筹资的便利,把生意搞大,利惠股东,这才是有抱负商人应做的事。

理由二:资金是企业的血液,资金短缺,等于贫血,随时可倒毙。

做生意,要资金周转,周转灵活才能赚钱。中国有句营商金言:“货如轮转利路通”。货物滞销,是生意的大忌。

买股票是把资金交给别人去应用,对于需要资金周转的商人,简直是致命伤。

买股票,就是买别人的公司的股份,你当然随时可以在股市把股份卖掉,问题是股市变幻莫测,你根本不知道明天的起落。

当你需要钱周转的时候,刚好逢到股市吃了泻药,就好像目前这样,你不卖没钱周转,卖掉又蒙受严重亏蚀,这时进退两难,你肯定会失眠。

有人以为“快狠凖”是股市赚钱绝招,商人们最好别相信。“快狠准”是破产捷径,比砒霜更毒,千万别尝试。

股票买得太少,根本赚不了几块钱,买得太多,失手时会把你拖垮,这种钱,商人赚不了。

股票是要长期收藏才有可能取得可观回酬的,商人除非持有长期无需动用的闲钱,否则,最好别买股票。

理由三:股票市场是为不懂得做生意及没有条件做生意的人而设的,不是为懂得做生意及有能力做生意的人而设的。

要了解这话,还得从头说起。股票市场发源于欧洲。话说四百多年前,欧洲社会形成两个阵营:

一个阵营是懂得做生意,但是资金不足的人。例如有生意眼光的人想建大船,到南美洲去采购黄金,但不够资金造大船。

另一个阵营,也是人数最多的,是拥有少量积蓄升斗小民,他们没有能力也不懂得做生意,这些“游资”长期投闲置散,无法创富。

于是有人想出一个办法:懂得做生意的商人,将他们的商业计划(例如造船往南美洲买黄金)写成计划书,公诸社会,邀请升斗小民拿出枕头下的金钱,交给他们去做生意,赚到钱后,按出资数额分享利润。

这样,商人有了资金,老百姓有了投资机会,股票制和股市就这样产生了。

从以上的历史事实,可以看出,股票是供不懂得做生意及没有条件做生意的人购买的,不是供商人购买的。

当然,跟着金融市场的成熟,股市的操作更复杂,但向大众筹资的基本概念并没改变。这也是股票交易所规定上市公司最少必须拥有1000名股东,最少有25%股票握在散户手中的原因。

作为老百姓之一,商人当然可以买股票,但那必须是在不影响你的资金周转的情况下,才可以这样做,如果你的生意随时需要资金周转的话,千万不要挪用营业资金去投资股票。

如果你有闲钱买股票的话,就表示生意很赚钱,很成功。既然如此,专心做生意不是更好吗?又何必去参股于你不认识的人的生意?

CMMT distributable income rises 41% in 3Q

Friday, 14 October 2011 12:17

KUALA LUMPUR: CapitaMalls Malaysia Trust’s (CMMT) distributable income in the third quarter ended Sept 30, 2011 (3QFY11), rose 40.6% to RM29.7 million from a year ago on higher property income and gross revenue.

Revenue increased 33.3% to RM57.84 million from RM43.39 million.

CMMT’s distributable income rose on net property income of RM41.1 million (35.6% higher than 3QFY10) and gross revenue of RM57.8 million (33.3% higher than 3QFY10), said CapitaMalls Malaysia REIT Management Sdn Bhd (CMRM), the manager of CMMT, in a press release yesterday.

For 3QFY11, CMMT distribution per unit (DPU) increased by 26.9% to 1.98 sen compared with 1.56 sen a year ago.

Based on CMMT’s closing price of RM1.28 per unit yesterday, its DPU of 1.98 sen translates to an annualised distribution yield of 6.1%, said CMRM.

CMRM chairman Kee Teck Koon said the stronger results were boosted by the Gurney Plaza extension in 3QFY11, the acquisition of which was completed on March 28.

“Since then, we have announced another acquisition of East Coast Mall in Kuantan, which is expected to be completed by year-end. We continue to actively look for acquisition opportunities as part of our growth strategy to enhance unit holder value,” he said.

Sharon Lim, CEO of CMRM, said East Coast Mall is expected to contribute over RM20 million in net property income per year to CMMT’s existing portfolio.

Lim said CMMT had a near full occupancy rate of 98.7% across its portfolio and rental renewal increases of 6.7%.

“Our asset enhancement works at Gurney Plaza are progressing well and on track to be completed by year-end, and will start contributing to our income from next year onwards,” Lim said.

A “pure-play” shopping mall REIT, CMMT’s portfolio comprises Gurney Plaza in Penang, The Mines in Selangor, and an interest in Sungei Wang Plaza in Kuala Lumpur. The portfolio has a total net lettable area of over two million sq ft.

For the cumulative nine-month period, CMMT’s distributable income quadrupled to RM85.4 million from RM21.1million a year ago while revenue more than tripled to RM167.7 million from RM43.4 million.

Shares in CMMT closed unchanged at RM1.28 yesterday.


This article appeared in The Edge Financial Daily, Ocotber 14, 2011.

Headwinds for education stocks

KUALA LUMPUR: The education sector was once an investor darling, but counters like HELP International Corp Bhd and Masterskill Education Group Bhd have headed south due to sector-wide over-expansion, rising competition and lower student intake.

Last month, RHB Research downgraded the sector to “neutral” on fears of a weak market outlook.

“We are turning cautious on prospects for the education sector in the coming quarter given rising macroeconomic headwinds, illiquidity of the stock in the sector, the relative small market cap of education stocks, and high foreign ownership,” it said in the Sept 29 report.

It downgraded HELP and Masterskill to “underperform” from “outperform” and “market perform”, while maintaining an “outperform” call on SEG International Bhd (SEGi).

RHB Research said education stocks were driven by Economic Transformation Programme (ETP) news flow in the past, but now the excitement has begun to recede.

“Entry point-projects (EPP) involving SEGi, such as the establishment of the Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) hub and the SkillsMalaysia INVITE programme, are already underway, while the announcement of the gradual liberalisation of the education sector under the Strategic Reform Initiatives is already priced in,” it said.

The research house has cut its FY12 price-earnings ratio (PER) by one or two times for the sector as its previous valuations were “overly optimistic” given the bearish outlook.

The poor outlook for the sector may be evident from the poor showing in financial results for some companies.

For 3QFY11 ended July 31, HELP’s net profit dived 92% to RM245,000 compared with RM3.24 million a year earlier. Its revenue, however, was flattish at RM23.96 million compared with RM23.38 million a year ago. For the nine months to July 2011, HELP’s net profit fell 25% to RM9.48 million, despite a 2.3% increase in revenue to RM79.63 million.
Similarly, Masterskill’s net profit fell 48% to RM11.58 million for 2QFY11 ended June 30, compared with RM22.43 million a year earlier.

Adam Chan Eu-Khin, HELP director of corporate planning, said the drastic fall in profit was mainly due to a one-off RM5 million cost to relocate its HELP ICT College from Klang to Fraser Business Park in Kuala Lumpur.

“As a result, we had to delay enrolment for our new courses as well,” he said.

Analysts, however, have noted that HELP’s earnings would still be flattish on a year-on-year basis without the RM5 million relocation cost.

“The delay caused HELP to postpone enrolment and marketing campaigns for new courses for the January/March intakes this year, which were reflected mostly in the 2QFY11 numbers,” said InsiderAsia in a recent report. It added that with HELP’s promotion to university status, it had to increase its manpower costs.

HELP was elevated to full university status in September, joining the ranks of the country’s 26 private universities.

HELP also saw its intake in Vietnam postponed due to a quality test by the government earlier this year, and had to incur cost to transfer its twinning programmes from HELP University College to HELP Academy.

Despite these headwinds, HELP is optimistic for better days ahead.

“The Vietnamese government has given the green light and we now have 50 students. We are beginning to market and recruit more students and hope to enroll 200 students by end-2012,” said Chan. He added it will also begin marketing to recruit more students after the relocation of its facility to Fraser Business Park.

Chan noted that the weakening US dollar has caused many Chinese students to pursue their education directly in the US and UK instead of Malaysia, and this will be a continuing trend in the future.

He added that given the recent termination of the joint-venture (JV) with Asia Pacific Land Bhd (AP Land), HELP will postpone its expansion plans in China indefinitely.

OSK Research analyst Kong Heng Siong said the termination of the JV with AP Land is a blessing in disguise as HELP would then be able to focus on marketing and improving its operations in the local and Southeast Asia markets.

“If you look at HELP’s operations, it has a firmer presence in Southeast Asia than China. It should definitely focus on recruiting students in this market as Malaysia will become a very attractive destination for tertiary education for those who cannot afford to go to US and UK,” he said.

Kong said he is unperturbed with the RM5 million relocation cost and expenditure to hire new staff, as the “short-term pain” is necessary to secure long-term growth for the group.

“However, HELP is still a niche player and it needs to diversify its offering in order to be able to attract more students in the future. HELP is expanding now, but it needs to ensure that it has enough students to fill the capacity,” he said.

An analyst with InsiderAsia noted that SEGi had experienced a similar gestation period when it expanded in the past, and is confident HELP’s earnings growth will recover in the future.

He said SEGi took a long while to digest all its acquisitions, brands and products.

“It was only in early 2010 that investors really took notice of SEGi’s turnaround and the stock price surged,” he said.

Earlier in the decade, SEGi’s profitability was low. Between 2001 and 2005, it offered courses under different brand names, such as Prime and Systematic. In 2006, the company streamlined its operations and consolidated into six large branches, including its flagship campus in Kota Damansara and used a single “SEGi” brand name.

By 2008, the fruit of the exercise was reaped, as SEGi’s pre-tax profit soared to RM9.88 million from RM2.48 million in 2007. It rose further to RM14.61 million in 2009 and RM54.31 million in 2010.

While the opening of the Fraser Business Park branch this year and the new Subang 2 campus in 2013 could cause some volatility in HELP’s medium-term earnings, the analyst is optimistic it will set the foundation for stronger growth in the future. “HELP is investing for the future,” he said, adding that another avenue for growth is its planned diversification into the lucrative private secondary education segment.

Kong said there are few catalysts that would re-rate HELP at the moment but there could be a minor improvement in profit for 4Q, depending on student intake in September. He added that HELP could propose a capital exercise to raise funds to build its flagship campus at Subang 2, which would also make its shares more liquid. OSK Research has a fair value of RM1.99 for HELP.

As for Masterskill, Kong said the stock has been battered down due to late student intake and reduction of National Higher Education Fund  (PTPTN) loan approvals. About 95% of Masterskill students depend on PTPTN for funding.

“Masterskill has also seen some new competition in the healthcare education business. Just like HELP, Masterskill will need to diversify its offering,” he said.

OSK Research has a “trading buy” call on Masterskill with fair value of RM1.91.

Masterskill now has to contend with a new competitor in the form of KPJ Healthcare Bhd, Malaysia’s largest private hospital operator.

In July, KPJ’s education subsidiary, KPJ International College of Nursing and Health Sciences (KPJIUC), attained university college status, giving it a boost in academic standing and the ability to grant its own degrees. KPJ plans to invest RM120 million to expand its Nilai campus and aims to see a student enrolment of 10,000 by 2015.

Datin Siti Sa’diah Sheikh Bakir, KPJ managing director, has said the institution aims to acquire the status of a full-fledged university by 2016.

KPJ has a large infrastructure of hospitals, doctors and nursing staff which can support its courses, provide its students on-the-job training and give them future employment opportunities.

While Masterskill has no hospitals, it may have better economies of scale, with a revenue base about 10 times higher and a student base seven times larger than KPJIUC’s.

HELP has lost 40.5% from its 52-week high of RM2.84 to last Friday’s close of RM1.69, while Masterskill has fallen 66.3% from its year-high of RM3.49 to RM1.18 last Friday.

Among the education stocks, SEGi stands as both OSK Research and RHB Research’s top picks.

“In the education business, size does matter. SEGi currently has a very diversified offering and is focusing on the middle-income group that forms a large population here. There is also room to grow its student number from 25,000 currently to its full capacity of 30,000,” he said.

SEGi saw its net profit grow 78% to RM36.25 million for 1HFY11 ended June, on the back of RM137.7 million in revenue. Its share price, however, has fallen 19.2% from a recent high of RM2.08 in July to RM1.68 last Friday.

“SEGi is still our pick for the sector, due to its good track record and resilience in riding out market uncertainties. SEGi deservedly trades at a premium to its peers at 12.8 times FY12 PER (HELP at 12.6 and Masterskill 8.8 times), supported by its superior compound annual growth rate of 26.3% (HELP 7.7% and Masterskill -19.6%).

We continue to believe that SEGi is best poised to deliver growth going forward,” said RHB Research.

Apart from SEGi, OSK Research is also upbeat on Bursa Malaysia newcomer Prestariang Bhd, which offers ICT certification and distribution of software licences.

“Prestariang has a very secure business model with a good response to its courses by both graduates and undergraduates. Other stocks are expected to see gradual earnings growth, but Prestariang is expected to see its earnings grow by more than 50% for FY11,” said Kong, who added the counter has an attractive low single-digit valuation.

Listed on July 27, Prestariang posted RM12.99 million in net profit and RM45.99 million revenue for 1HFY11 ended June 30. However, its stock has since fallen 25.6% from its IPO price of 90 sen to Friday’s close of 67 sen.

Prestariang currently has an order book of RM280 million, with projects until 2015. It also counts international players such as Microsoft, Oracle, IBM and Autodesk as partners.

Alexander Chia of RHB Research said in the midst of waning global market sentiment, investors are more inclined to invest in defensive stocks.

“With a global recession looking possible next year, defensive stocks are in favour. In addition, investors looking to bottom fish to benefit from a near-term market bounce, would likely gravitate to higher beta issues that have seen a sharp selldown,” he said.

He added that although there is long-term growth potential for the education sector, HELP is a rather illiquid stock, which does not make it attractive for investors given the bearish market environment.

Although education is a non-cyclical sector, the headwinds faced by some players have been a drag on their performance and it remains to be seen when these will blow over.


This article appeared in The Edge Financial Daily, Ocotber 17, 2011.

Public Bank third quarter net profit rises 14.8pc

KUALA LUMPUR: Public Bank Bhd's net profit for the third quarter ended September 30 increased 14.8 per cent to RM898.7 million, up from RM782.7 million a year ago.
This was driven by strong loans and deposits growth and stable asset quality, which resulted in higher net interest income and lower loan impairment charges, the bank said.

"The outlook of the Malaysian banking sector, in which the group largely operates in, continues to be stable and supportive of growth.

"We continue to see the group's business performance to be in line with expectations and on track in meeting the key business targets for 2011," Public Bank's founder and chairman Tan Sri Teh Hong Piow said in a statement yesterday.

Revenue for the same period increased by 13.7 per cent to RM3.27 billion from RM2.87 billion, while earnings per share were 25.66 sen, compared with 22.35 sen a year ago.

"The retail banking business is projected to grow at a moderate pace amid stiff competition and the introduction of regulatory measures to address rising household debt levels," Teh said.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, its net profit grew 18.4 per cent to RM2.6 billion from RM2.2 billion, while revenue rose 16.9 per cent to RM9.4 billion from RM8.1 billion previously.

"The Public Bank group's sound financial results are a validation of its effective organic growth strategies and sustainable business model.

"The group net return on equity of 26.7 per cent remains the highest among Malaysian banks."

The net profit growth and net return on equity were driven by strong revenue growth, continued disciplined cost management with low cost-to-income ratio of 30 per cent, and superior asset quality with improvement in credit charges by 15 per cent.

Public Bank reaffirmed its number one position in domestic lending for residential mortgages, commercial property financing and passenger vehicles financing.

Teh said the bank's balance sheet growth indicators remained healthy with gross loans at RM172.7 billion, up 13.8 per cent on an annualised basis.

Domestic loan growth, meanwhile, remained strong with an annualised growth rate of 14.1 per cent.

Total customer deposits grew by an annualised rate of 12.7 per cent to RM193.7 billion, while domestic customer deposits grew at a stronger annualised growth rate of 13.8 per cent.

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

China bubble concerns spread

 Wednesday October 12, 2011

Developers and insurance companies rushing to invest in commercial property
BEIJING: Concerns over a bubble in China's residential property market are spreading to the commercial real-estate sector at a time when developers are upping their exposure, and the country's insurance industry is poised to invest huge sums into the space.

While commercial prices are steady and insurance companies are watching and waiting, residential property developers have increased investments in the office sector after Chinese government measures were instituted to cool home prices.

Shimao Property, Country Garden, China Resources Land and Poly have been increasing their investments in commercial property. Smaller developers such as SinoOcean Land and Gemdale are increasing commercial exposure, too.

Commercial real-estate investment in China will exceed one trillion yuan (US$157bil) this year, up from 740 billion yuan in 2010, as developers have shifted away from the housing market, the target of nearly two years of government measures to cool the sector.

The investment frenzy into commercial property has also been fuelled by expectations of a potentially huge demand from China's insurers, which won approval late last year to invest up to 10% of their assets in real estate, most of which was aimed at commercial properties.

Investmen frenzy: Workmen install a poster onto a wall surrounding a construction site showing an artist’s impression of the new business district of Binhai, on the outskirts of Tianjin in this March 2, 2011 file photo. A glut of commercial property is already plaguing cities such as Chengdu, Shenyang and Tianjin. — Reuters 
 
But even before any major investment from insurance companies, prices of office space and shopping malls have jumped and rental yields have slipped due to speculative buying, fuelling concerns of a bubble forming across the industry.

“The low investment yield does give us some concern that prices probably have gone up a lot and we need to see the income growth before we can see values going higher,” said Michael Klibaner, head of China research for property consultancy Jones Lang LaSalle.

Insurers, including China Life, Ping An, China Pacific and Goldman Sachs backed Taikang Life, have 500 billion yuan available to invest in property, based on the industry's total assets of about five trillion yuan.
That's enough to buy all top-grade office buildings in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen, analysts say.

But only a fraction of the 500 billion yuan has been invested so far, as insurers keep a tight grasp on their money, given the concerns surrounding the sector.

Annual gross rental yields on commercial properties in major cities such as Beijing and Shanghai have fallen to 46% from around 10% several years ago.

Commercial properties in major cities such as Beijing and Shanghai are now generating annual gross rental returns that are below China's official one-year lending rate of 6.56%. That means if investors borrow and plough that money into commercial property, they stand to lose because the returns won't even cover the borrowing cost.

Last month, China's banking regulator urged banks to strictly monitor risks when they provide loans to commercial property projects and set a higher criteria for approving such loans than for home mortgages.
The China Insurance Regulatory Commission (CIRC) currently requires insurers to submit all property transactions for its approval as it works on more detailed investment rules.

“The risk is a bit high if insurers invest in the real-estate market now. There are good reasons for CIRC to hold back the issuance of its final guidelines,” said Chen Hongxia, an analyst at Oriental Securities in Shanghai.
Faced with mounting pressure to meet their long-term liabilities amid a rapidly ageing population, insurers had spent years lobbying Beijing to lift the property investment ban.

Domestic investors are largely restricted from buying properties abroad due to China's closed capital account, forcing them to look for investment opportunities within the country.

Investment in commercial property is encouraged by China's vow to boost domestic consumption as part of its economic rebalancing.

Shirley Xiao, senior vice-president of top Chinese developer China Vanke, described the commercial property rush as irrational.

Many developers lacked the financial backing and human resources needed to run office properties and malls, and China's urbanisation was far from over, boding well for the residential sector over the long term, she said. “We don't think there is logic behind this.”

A glut of commercial property was already plaguing cities such as Chengdu, Shenyang and Tianjin, analysts said. - Reuters

Shopping malls are being built across the country, with some boasting floor areas of more than several hundred thousand sq m.

The rationale behind building more malls: China has much less retail space per capita than Europe and the United States. Retail space per capita in China is less than 0.5 sq m, compared with about one sq m in Europe and 23 sq m in the United States.

But some analysts say this comparison is misleading, given the sheer size of China's population.
In some major Chinese cities such as Beijing and Shanghai, retail space per capita is already nearing or surpassing the European and US levels.

Only large developers with easy access to bank credit and strong state parent backing, such as China Resources Land, would be successful in running large malls when there was a glut, analysts said.

It is more risky for smaller developers such as SinoOcean Land and Gemdale to expand aggressively in commercial property, which requires more expertise and is more capital intensive and time consuming.
And as more people shop online, it is getting increasingly challenging to run a shopping mall and make it appealing to merchants, consumers and investors.

“I think it will be a golden decade for the consumer Whether it will be a golden decade for developers remains to be seen,” said James Hawkey, executive director of retail services at Cushman & Wakefield in China. - Reuters

KNM gets US$200m contract in Sri Lanka from Octagon unit

Written by Surin Murugiah of theedgemalaysia.com   
Tuesday, 11 October 2011 19:19

KUALA LUMPUR: KNM GROUP BHD [] has landed a conditional US$200 million (RM638 million) contract to build a waste to energy plant in Sri Lanka from OCTAGON CONSOLIDATED BHD []’s subsidiary Orizon Renewable Energy (Private) Ltd (ORE).

It said on Tuesday, Oct 11 that its subsidiary KNM Process Systems Sdn Bhd had been awarded the contract to build the plant capacity to process up to 1,000 tons per day of municipal solid waste for generation of a minimum of 40 MW of gross electrical energy in Karadiyana, Thumbowila, Kesbewa, Colombo.

It said the conditional award was subject to among others, the signing of a definitive agreement, based on terms and conditions acceptable to the parties including the financiers of the project by December 2011.

KNM said the project, which involves the generation of renewable energy from municipal solid waste at the Project site covering up to 20 acres of land in Karadiyana, was to be implemented under Public Private Partnership between ORE and the Waste Management Authority of Western Province, an agency under the Government of Sri Lanka.

The company said the project was expected to contribute positively to its earnings for the financial years ending Dec 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014.

KNM Group: Peterborough project delayed

Date: 10/10/2011


KNM Group Bhd
(Oct 10, RM1.20)
Maintain underperform with fair value of 70 sen: Last week, KNM announced that it had been prompted by its client that the financial close of its UK Peterborough contract (worth RM2.2 billion) has been delayed to December.

As such, the company believes it will be unable to meet its guided FY11 revenue of RM2.2 billion and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation (Ebitda) earnings of RM270 million.

The project involves the development of a biomass and waste recycling centre in the UK using high-end technology. KNM was awarded the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contract on Dec 21, 2010.

We are not surprised by the announcement as we have noted that the project had yet to achieve financial close by August. The management had previously guided that it would likely be achieved in early 2HFY11.

As such, we had postponed the project's earnings contribution to FY12 in our previous note (dated Aug 23, 2011).

We reiterate our view that the stock will likely continue to report disappointing earnings. Moreover, it has significant exposure to Europe and the UK, which are at high risk of economic slowdown.

As such, we foresee continual volatility in its forward earnings despite its order backlog of RM5.3 billion (of which half is made up of the Peterborough project).

We estimate that the Peterborough contract accounts for around 80% of our core FY12 earnings per share (EPS).

However, this is based on conservative assumptions that the company secures minimal new wins beyond the project within FY12 and Ebitda margins grow by one percentage point to 9.5% (from our 8.5% assumption for FY11).

We maintain our FY11 to FY13 earnings estimates as we had already assumed: (i) the project would kick start in FY12; and (ii) lower than guided revenue and Ebitda earnings of RM1.98 billion and RM168.5 million respectively for FY11.

However, we are removing our FY11 dividend per share assumption of two sen, as we believe the company is unlikely to pay a dividend under such difficult conditions.

Upside risks to our view include: (i) better than expected margins for contracts executed in the latter part of FY11; and (ii) higher than expected contract wins moving ahead which will significantly increase revenue earnings.

The stock has continued to negatively surprise the market, reinforcing our view that the stock deserves to trade at a discount to sector peers. We maintain our fair value of 70 sen per share based on nine times FY12 price earnings ratio. ' RHB Research, Oct 10


This article appeared in The Edge Financial Daily, Ocotber 11, 2011.
























Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Masterskill Education Group sees new substantial shareholder

Written by Joseph Chin of theedgemalaysia.com   
Wednesday, 05 October 2011 21:15

 KUALA LUMPUR: Masterskill Education Group Bhd (MEGB) reported that Siva Kumar s/o M. Jeyapalan has emerged as a substantial shareholder in the education group.

A filing showed he acquired 41.20 million shares or a 10.05% stake on Wednesday, Oct 5.  The share price closed at RM1.09.

His emergence as a substantial shareholder could be linked to an acquisition undertaken by MEGB on March 21 when the MEGB acquired two companies -- Unihealth (M) Sdn Bhd (UMSB) and Unihealth Education Group Sdn Bhd (UEGSB) – for RM3 million cash.

The companies were acquired from Siva Kumar and Ching Koon Kah @ Chin Kon Kah.

UMSB had an authorised share capital of RM100,000 comprising 100,000 ordinary shares of RM1 each of which RM10.00 had been issued and fully paid-up. The intended principal activity of UMSB was to provide education and management of education; to establish, manage and operate nursing academy; and provision of basic and advance nursing training.

UEGSB had an authorised share capital of RM100,000 comprising 100,000 ordinary shares of RM1 each of which RM10 had been issued and paid-up. The intended principal activity of UEGSB was the provision of medical, clinical, health care services and nursing home.

MEGB had then said the rationale for the acquisition was in line with the expansion of MEGB group’s future expansion plan and to contribute to a more organised corporate structure of the group.

本益比過高估價低 科恩馬投資評級看空

 (吉隆坡5日訊)儘管科恩馬(KNM,7164,主要板工業)獲得新工程,但價值較現有總值50億令吉訂單小,且開工日期未定,券商維持該股“賣出”評級。

此外,大馬投資研究指出,他們也將調整科恩馬合理價格,因為目前股價已低于早前每股1.20令吉的估價。

該行指出,目前科恩馬以2011財年19倍本益比進行交易,油氣領域的本益比僅17倍,以該公司過去較遜色的盈利紀錄來看,並不符合。

科恩馬昨天獲得八方旺組合(OCTAGON,7109,主要板工業)總值7000萬令吉先進熱量氣化反應器的合約。

科恩馬也是八方旺組合在斯里蘭卡,再生能源發電廠的工程、採購、建築及委外(EPCC)合約的入圍公司。

大馬投資研究相信,雖然化反應器的合約期限是從科恩馬獲訂金開始的22個月內完成,但八方旺組合是否獲得斯里蘭卡政府購電合約才是關鍵。

但分析員認為,即便新工程明年初開工,對科恩馬2012至2013財年的收益預測不會有重大改變。

今日閉市,科恩馬報1.20令吉,起3仙,成交量達707萬3800股。

券商買進心頭好.新國經濟放緩衝擊 楊忠禮能源收益或僅跌5%

05/10/2011 22:53
券商:艾芬證券研究
目標價:2.45令吉


  楊忠禮能源(YTLPOWR,6742,主要板基建)淨利表現或受到新加坡經濟放緩影響,但我們相信該公司2012至2013財年的收益預測下滑空間僅限于5%。

自2009年3月,該公司全面收購西拉雅能源公司(Power Seraya)100%股權以來,后者為楊忠禮能源貢獻顯著稅前盈利,2011財年達58%。

因此新加坡經濟轉弱,電力需求減少或影響該公司收益表現。

不過,觀察新加坡過去25年電力需求和經濟週期,該國電力需求增長率最糟糕的情況是停滯不前,未陷負增長。 

回顧1998年亞洲金融風暴,電力需求按年增長6%;2001年911事件,電力需求按年增長2%;2009年信貸危機,製造業電力需求雖按年下滑12%,但被商業領域10%按年增長率抵銷。

而且,我們的預算屬保守且與經濟學家一致。

此外,西拉雅能源銷售額每改變1%,楊忠禮能源2012財年淨利將改變1400萬令吉或1.2%。截至目前,楊忠禮能源股價下滑了31%,意味著西拉雅能源的需求風險已被納入計算。

因此,我們維持該股“買入”評級。

至于剛推出的“Yes”4G流動網絡服務,雖進展順利,但也納入了2012財年6億3000萬令吉的稅前虧損。

閉市時,楊忠禮能源以每股1.65令吉掛收,起1仙,成交量達355萬9200股。

翻身致富,你有選對標的嗎?及早投資這6項 你已經賺100倍!

撰文者:郭莉芳、蕭勝鴻

加入85度C,7年不到,身價暴增185倍
85度C成立不到7年,去年底股票在台上市(編按:KY美食(2723)),當初成立資本額約13億元,目前市價約285元(截至 2011.1.14),總市值2,430億元,跟著老闆吳政學一起打拼的20位麵包師傅和資深幹部,共持有其中3成股權,這些人靠著創業,不到7年,手中 股票都增值185倍,年平均報酬率約110%。

投資富蘭克林坦伯頓成長基金,56年增值764倍
1954年成立的富蘭克林坦伯頓成長基金,長期報酬率驚人,當年投資坦伯頓爵士的受益人,基金抱到2010年底為止,累積報酬達76,424%。也就是當年若投入1萬元新台幣,現在可以滾成764萬,年平均報酬率約12%。

投資巴菲特的波克夏公司,48年增值28,000倍
1962年,股神巴菲特(Warren Buffett)成立一家投資公司(波克夏前身),資本額720萬美元,其中100萬美元屬他個人持有。現在,巴菲特手中持有的波克夏 (Berkshire Hathaway,NYSE:BRKA,NYSE:BRKB)股票市值高達280億美元(統計至2011.01.17),漲幅高達2萬8,000倍,平均 年報酬率超過23%。

買台塑股票,46年增值11,680倍
經營之神王永慶創辦的台塑公司(1301)1964年股票掛牌,當年資本額500萬元,如今市值約584億元。如果你在那時買進1張台塑股票,抱到現在(截至2011.01.18),這張股票市值將上漲1萬1,680倍,年平均報酬率超過22%。

買進蘋果股票,14年漲95倍
蘋果(Apple Inc. US-AAPL)創辦人賈伯斯(Steven Jobs)1996年重新接掌,當時每股股價一度跌到只剩3.6美元,現在股價則漲到348美元(截至2011.01.14),如果當時買進抱到現在,股價漲幅將近95倍,年平均報酬率約38%。

買敦化南路順成蛋糕店面,41年增值242倍
不只股票、基金可以賺百倍,位在台北市敦化南路與忠孝東路口的順成蛋糕店面(含1樓與地下室),1969年由順成老闆娘吳楊愛珠以165萬元買下,現在估值約4億元,41年增值了242倍,年平均報酬率約14%。

雪球投資法  穩穩實現發財夢
10萬元滾成1,000萬元,讓你的資產成長100倍!乍聽之下,好像很難。可是,從前面的6個例子看,就像大家想像的「百倍發財夢」一樣,你可以 用股票、基金、房地產、甚至是創業的方式,讓你的資產長大100倍、甚至是1萬倍。但前提是要:挑對標的、方法,還要有夠長的時間去等待。

就像股神巴菲特的格言:人生就像雪球。最重要的是找到濕漉漉的雪,以及一座斜坡夠長的山。」投資工具的報酬率就像「斜坡」,坡度是否夠「長」則是指 時間。雪球(財富)要滾得大,一定要有夠濕的雪,在斜度剛好、長度夠長的山坡上滾動,而且滾動的雪球可能不只一個,挑對環境和方法,同時滾動多個雪球,效 果肯定更大。

落實到執行面,你一定會問:誰是下一個王永慶和巴菲特、讓我們可以長期投資?又要去哪裡找一檔能像富蘭克林坦伯頓成長基金一樣、長期繳出穩定報酬的 好基金?老實說,這樣的好標的真的是可遇不可求,怎麼辦?有沒有其他「滾雪球」的好方法呢?當然有,「濕漉漉的雪」能否滾成夠大的雪球,固然不易判斷。但 是,山坡斜度是否剛好?是否夠長?足以讓雪球滾大,卻是固定的、而且是比較容易判別的。

簡單說,先找到對的「山坡」,接下來,任何標的只要讓它開始滾動,耐心驗證、等待,大概可以預期這個雪球在一定時間後可以滾成多大。一旦發現挑錯了雪球,這堆雪不夠「濕」,只要「山坡」對,咱們還能趕快換標的,從頭來過。
問題是能讓財富滾大100倍的「山坡」哪裡找?答案就在下面這個「複利增值」公式:
公式
由這個公式可以看出,你的財富可以滾成多大?影響因子包括1.本金大小;2.報酬率高低;3.持有時間長短。這3個變數要如何?你可以自己決定。舉 例說,如果拿10萬元本金,年年穩賺18%,要增值100倍、滾出1,000萬,得花28年。如果你覺得18%報酬率的「山坡」太長了,能不能縮短一些? 當然可以,換成報酬率50%的「山坡」,只要12年就能讓你的百倍增值夢達陣。相反的,如果把報酬率下修為7%,同樣要滾到1,000萬元,則需69年。
▲報酬率愈高,達成百倍發財夢的時間愈短!
▲報酬率愈高,達成百倍發財夢的時間愈短!
除了挑「斜率」不同的「山坡」外,改變本金大小,也是你能決定的。如果把10萬本金提高到100萬元,報酬率維持7%,只需要35年就可以滾到1,000萬元。如果同樣用100萬本金,報酬率再拉高到18%,則達成年限會進一步縮短為14年。

放大本金、挑對標的
就能長抱等著賺時間複利
這樣看來,要讓資產成長100倍,找個斜率夠高的「山坡」,然後再下重本、押大注,達成速度豈不是愈快?可是,這樣做的風險也愈高、愈難掌握。暴起暴跌的報酬率,賺得多、賠得快,當本金開始虧損時,下一次想翻身,就得創造更高額報酬,投資難度更高。

為什麼?看看下面這個例子:小明與小華兩人各拿出本金10萬元投入股市,謹慎保守的小明,每年只想賺18%,個性積極的小華報酬率大起大落,1年可以大賺50%、隔年卻會小賠20%,他們各自用這樣的預設報酬率投資,10年後誰的資產會比較多?

從圖2可以明顯看出,保守的小明10年下來累積的資產竟是小華的2倍,為什麼會這樣?這個試算告訴我們3件事:

1.穩健報酬勝過大賺小賠:在資產增值過程中,穩健的報酬率剛開始會輸給「大賺小賠」的賺錢模式,但是,時間拉長,連續10年、年賺18%比起相同時間有一半年度賺50%,其餘年度小賠,將會多賺274%。

2.投資千萬不能賠到本金:即使是「大賺小賠」,都會讓你的滾錢速度變慢。
▲穩健報酬勝過大賺小賠
▲穩健報酬勝過大賺小賠

3.年賺18%的威力真的很大::這樣的報酬率用複利滾存,5年就可以讓你的資產翻1倍,28年則能讓資產膨脹100倍。看到這裡,順帶一提,你就知道台灣公務員優惠定存利率18%有多迷人了,還好政府做了限制,否則國庫真的會大失血!

搞懂了「複利增值」的公式,再記住顧好本金、不讓投資虧損的原則,找到適合的「山坡」開始滾動「雪球」,讓資產成長100倍真的不會太難。記得,關 鍵條件在:一筆夠大的本金、一個穩健的報酬率、一段夠長的投資時間。落實到執行面,第一步要先用力存錢(盡量將本金擴大)。接著,用對方法挑出報酬率夠穩 的工具,最後,久久長抱(投入時間夠長),經過長時間複利滾存,資產就會像滾雪球般愈滾愈大。

有了以上基礎的觀念後,接下來,就要設法去找報酬率夠穩的投資工具了。要怎麼找?我們找到兩位達人,一位是國營事業員工溫國信,他的月薪從1萬起 跳,用15年時間,靠股票滾存出逾1,000萬的資產,近5年還用「倉儲式」選股法,年年創造逾15%的獲利。他甚至告訴《Smart智富》月刊記者: 「只要用我的方法——本金多、報酬率高、拉長時間,人人都可以是巴菲特。」

另一位則是被譽為「女巴菲特」的基金經理人賽拉‧佐豪森(Thyra Zerhusen),她近10年的基金年化報酬率為9.96%,績效勝過巴菲特的5.43%!賽拉師承價值投資法,但擅用「未來本益比」專挑中型股操作, 賺取倍數獲利。學會他們的方法,「資產增值100倍」將不再是夢,而是一套具體可行的策略!

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

分享锦集:趁低落实股票店铺化

Sep 30th, 2011 | By | Category: 分享锦集

上周我在“视股票为店铺”一文中,提出了把股票视为店铺,把股息视为店铺租金的构想。

一些股友读后,认为我的构想不错,但实行起来恐怕不容易。

当然不容易,但困难并非不能克服。

正如我在“视”文中所说的“惟有有耐心、有信心及有守纪律精神的人,才有可能达到此境界(指通过视股票为店铺以达到财务自主)。”

我们这个社会,没有容易赚钱的行业,每一个行业都要克服许多的困难,才有可能把钱赚到手。

股票

1.信心

你必须对股票有信心。由于股市波动激烈,股价大起大落,许多人认为股票风险太高,只适合“投机“,不适合“投资”,尤其不适合长期投资。

对股票的误解,莫以此为甚。大部份人都忘记了,股票是公司的股份,股票代表企业的资产和业务,股票的风险不会比做生意的风险更高。

如果股票是高风险的行为,那么公积金、保险公司、单位信托基金就不应买股票了,因为这些机构都是关系到数以百万计小市民利益的组织,他们不能从事高风险的投资。

如果懂得投资的话,股票其实是相当安全的,就以种植股来说,种植公司所拥有的是油棕园,如果说种植股风险高的话,就等于说油棕园风险高,你会同意吗?

建立对股票的正确概念,是建立对股票信心的第一步。

除非你有信心,你不会对股票投资产生耐心。

2.耐心

企业需要时间去成长,价值需要时间去创造,所以,股票要长期投资,才有可能增值。

即使是最好的股票,如果不能长期持有的话,也不可能发挥其增值潜能。

我有一些朋友,在买进优质股之后,十多二十年,几乎从来没有卖过,他们所取得的盈利,不是一倍或二倍,而是数十倍,他们就这样,靠股息过着写意的晚年生活。

我国最富有的企业家,如李莱生家族、丹斯里李深静、丹斯里杨忠礼等,从来没有卖过他们的机构的股票,所以他们能成为巨富,为什么我们不能以他们为榜样,进行长期投资呢?

通过复利增长,长期投资可以创造财富的奇迹。

3.守纪律的精神

脚踏实地投资,不要投机取巧,不要预测股市动向,因为到现在为止,还没有人发明可以预测股市的“水晶球”,尤其是股市的短期动向。靠短线操作赚钱的人不是没有,只是巴仙率低到不值得我们去尝试。

假如你以低价买到优质股的话,最好不要轻易脱售,一只可以成长5公斤的西瓜,长到两公斤时就割下,实在太可惜。

第一步

你要从1000家上市公司中,选出具备以下特点的股票:

周息率(D/Y)最好比银行定期存款利率高1倍。目前定存利率为3%多,你所买的视为店铺的股票,周息率(股息回酬率)最好高过6%。

过去股价高昂,不容易找到周息率高过6%的好股,经过这一轮的暴跌,周息率已大大的提高,只要你用心筛选,你不难找到周息率高过6%的好股。

最理想的方法,是买进现在派息率较低,但将来派息率将提高的股票,长期持有,一个典型的例子是速远(Zhulian),假如你在3年前以每股1令吉买进的话,那时每年派发12仙的股息,去年以3送1发红股后,每股投资成本降至75仙,该公司仍维持每年派息12仙,周息率升至16%。如果你在熊市中,趁价低廉时买进有派高息潜能的股票,长期持有,将来也可能享受到高股息回酬。

利直南(DKSH)就有此潜能。

第二步

你所买进的高股息股,还必须有适度的成长潜能。

股息高,但公司没有成长,股票不会增值,股息即使再高,也得不偿失。

高股息和成长,其实并没有冲突。

实际上,只有有适度成长的公司,才有可能保持派发高股息。

有些人只注重成长,不注重股息,等于是购买没有租金的店铺,店铺也很难增值。

高股息的公司,即使成长比较缓慢,股价也有可能高企,安利和健力士就是典型的例子。

第三步

最好购买风险较低的企业股票。假如你翻查过去30年上市公司纪录的话,你会发现几乎从来没有一家种植公司陷困,所以种植股是值得考虑的对象,但必须购买有成长潜能的种植股(未成熟油棕面积大及不断扩大种植面积的种植公司)。

当然,每一类股票都可找到好股,只要你肯下功夫研究,一定有收获。

第四步

最好用股息买进更多同一只股票,以加速复利增长率。

第五步

假如你每个月投资500令吉,如果你所买的股票,股息加资本增值,平均每年取得复利增长12%的话,10年后,你将拥有115,019令吉的身家,每年可以收到超过1万令吉的股息。你可以将这只股票视为一间小小的店铺。

假如你有守纪律的精神,加上信心和耐心,同时把你每年从公司所取得的花红也投资进去的话,你要在退休时拥有12间此类店铺,绝对是可以实现的梦想。

这一轮的股市暴跌,使许多追高的投资者蒙受重大亏损,这是很不幸的。

但是,机会是隐藏在危机中,对于反向投资者来说,这正是低价买进好股的良机。

没有人知道股市何时到底,作为价值投资者,我们应以价值为投资标准。

我认为周息率如果在8%以上,本益比不超过6倍,股价等于净有形资产,而业务稳定的股票,都值得购买。

如果你具备以上3个条件-有信心、耐心,又有守纪律的精神,你就有可能把股票视为店铺的梦想,化为事实。

分享锦集:视股票为店铺

Sep 23rd, 2011 | By | Category: 分享锦集

 要在退休后达致财务自主,产业和股票仍不失为理想的投资对象。

两者各有其长处与短处。

购买产业,收取租金,是明智的投资。

购买产业,住宅不如店铺。住宅是出租给穷人——没有能力自置产业的人。租屋居住是一种消费行为,削弱了租户的财力,故不易起租,收不到租金的情况也经常出现,使屋主烦恼不已。

店铺是出租给有钱人,他们利用你的店铺做生意,是一种创造财富的行为。

如果租户生意兴隆的话,加租不是问题,收不到租金的情况也较少出现,屋主较少烦恼。

对于做生意的人来说,地点至为重要,生意一旦做旺,租户不会轻易搬迁,更何况改租别店需花大笔装修费。对住宅租户来说,地点较不重要,所以,若租金过高,租户就可能易地为良,故屋主不敢随便提高住宅租金。

是的,购买店铺收租是良好的投资。

问题是在过去两年中,产业价值暴涨,尤其是地点优良的店铺,涨幅高达50至100%,租金却没有作正比例的上升,导致回酬率下降。

两三年前,地点不错的店铺,毛租金回酬率高达8%,现在已下降至5%左右。从回酬的角度看,买店铺出租已逐渐失去吸引力。

产业投资的回酬来自租金收入和产业增值,租金收入欠理想,而在产业大幅度上升之后,增值的幅度也不乐观。

复利创财富

我认为产业涨至目前的水平,不敢说已是强弩之末,但上升速度肯定将放缓,甚至停滞不前,需要巩固一段较长的时间才有可能再上一层楼。

投资者的资金是有限的,所以,应该比较各种投资的回酬率,然后将资金投注在回酬较高及增值较快的资产,才是明智之举。

投资者一定要知道,复利增长具有创造财富的神奇力量。

从短期来说,复利增长率(compound growth rate)相差3%,并不会有明显的影响,但长期来说,开始时相差3%,但在十年、二十年之后,总数可能相差一倍。

复利的神奇力量,是在后期才发挥出来的。所以,在选择投资时,应尽量争取较高的回酬率,以加速财富的累积速度。

在产业价值暴涨后,股票已成为更有吸引力的投资管道。

股票投资,风险肯定比产业高,但如果懂得投资,回酬也可能较产业为高,最低限度在未来数年,当产业价格停滞不前时是如此。

股票价格波动激烈,而股价难以预测,要靠低买高卖来赚取高于产业的回酬,难之又难。

所以,要取得较高稳定的收入,就必须注重股息收入。

注重股息收入

你会购买没有租金的店铺吗?

我相信脚踏实地的投资者不会买租不出去的店铺。

我有一个朋友,在吉隆坡市郊的一个新开辟的市镇,购买了一间店铺,长期租不出去,而每个月要负担六、七千令吉的分期付款,压得他透不过气来。

没有租金收入,使他个人的现金流量不足,换句话说,收入不足以应付支出(包括店铺供款),使他生活陷入困境。

同样的情形,购买股票如果没有股息收入的话,将使个人的收支不平衡,生活素质将下降。

试想将大笔资金投注在没有入息的资产,生活变得捉襟见肘,即使将来能赚到大钱,又有什么意义呢?

视为租金

所以,我一向强调股息的重要性。如果有稳定的股息收入的话,我们可以把股票视为店铺,股息视为租金,这样才可以长期收藏,就好像长期持有店铺一样。

由于股票投资风险比产业投资高,所以,股息收入理应高过店铺租金回酬率,才算合理。

我的想法是定期存款比店铺更安全,所以店铺回酬率应高过定存才合理,定存利率为3%,店铺租金回酬率要5%以上才值得投资(未扣税及费用)。

而店铺既然比股票安全,则股息回酬率(D/Y,通常称为周息率)应比店铺租金回酬率更高才算合理。

如果店铺租金毛回酬率为5%是可以被接受的话,则股票周息率应比定存利率高一倍——6%以上才值得投资(指净股息收益)。

股息的稳定性也是一个必须重视的因素,股息波动太大的股票也不够资格被视为店铺。

业务“安全性”

另一个重要因素是安全性。

“安全性”不是指股价,因为没有人可以预测股价的趋势。这里“安全性”是指公司业务的稳定性,财务的健全及企业有适度的成长。

如果一家公司派发合理及稳定的股息,业务与财务稳固,而又有适度的成长,买进之后,就可以视为店铺,长期持有,视股息为租金,视股价上升为产业增值。

假设你退休前最后一个月的收入为1万令吉。

如果你由初投职场时就锁定十二只股票,长期累积,并把股息重新投资下去(现在开始有些公司以新股代替现金为股息),到退休时,每只股票每年付给你1万令吉的净股息,你可以视为一个月的收入。

十二只股票每年每只发给你1万令吉,等于你每个月都有1万令吉的固定收入,你人是退休了,但收入并没有退休,你就可以过着高素质的晚年生活。

我说“高素质”是因为你退休后开支减少了,但收入并没有减少,你可以真正享受你的晚年。但惟有有耐心、有信心及有守纪律精神的人,才有可能达到此境界。

所以,你要过怎样的退休生活,决定因素还是你自己。

Octagon awards RM70m gasification plant job to KNM

Written by Joseph Chin of theedgemalaysia.com  
Monday, 03 October 2011 19:16

 KUALA LUMPUR: OCTAGON CONSOLIDATED BHD [] has awarded a US$22 million (RM70.18 million) contract to KNM GROUP BHD [] to build an advanced thermal gasification reactor.

Octagon said on Monday, Oct 3 its unit Green Energy and TECHNOLOGY [] Sdn Bhd (GreenTech) had sealed a contract with KNM Process Systems Sdn Bhd for the reactor. The contractor would undertake the manufacturing, engineering, installation and pre-commission of the reactor.

GreenTech is undertaking Octagon’s waste to energy business and it had developed the reactor to be used by its subsidiary Orizon Renewable Energy (Private) Ltd  for its waste to energy plant in Sri Lanka.

The project involves the generation of renewable energy from municipal solid waste at the project site covering up to 20 acres of land in Karadiyana.

It would be implemented under public private partnership  between Orizon and the Waste Management Authority of Western Province, an agency under the Sri Lanka government.

On Sept 12, Octagon announced Orizon had received the letter of intent from the Ceylon Electricity Board to purchase electrical energy generated from Orizon’s waste to energy plant.

KNM Process had also been shortlisted as one of the contractors for the engineering, procurement, CONSTRUCTION [] and commissioning (EPCC) contract for the waste to energy plant in Colombo.

Monday, October 3, 2011

YTL Communications wins best new service award

Monday October 3, 2011 MYT 2:15:00 PM

 KUALA LUMPUR: YTL Communications Sdn Bhd, a global frontrunner in mobile 4G, won the "Best New Service" award at the recent Global 2011 InfoVision Awards ceremony.

It bagged the award at the prestigious event, for its innovative Yes 4G service, Malaysia's fastest mobile internet with voice.

YTL Communications said in a statement today, with almost a year into its operations, the award comes as a clear acknowledgement that Malaysia is at the forefront of the world when it comes to the adoption of next-generation wireless technologies.

With the win, the company joins an elite list of operators from around the world, including British Telecoms, Australia's Telstra and Hong Kong's PCCW, who have received the same honour in the history of InfoVision Award.

YTL Communications chief executive officer Wing K Lee said: "The award is another validation of the vision and dedication that went hand-in-hand in the creation of Yes 4G and our drive to bring positive change to Malaysia."

Yes, a brand under YTL Communications, offer the fastest mobile internet with voice service, and the first mobile operator to bring mobile internet and voice together in one plan.

YTL Communication is a subsidiary and the communications utility of YTL Power International Bhd and part the YTL Corporation Bhd Group. - BERNAMA